SLAG 发表于 2025-3-30 09:50:36
Peter Fishburn developed in utility theory, measurement theory and social choice, but also for contributions to more applied domains such as voting (in particular for his joint work with Steve Brams on approval voting). He explains why he neglected game theory by the kind of formalism he was familiar with.GLUE 发表于 2025-3-30 15:22:13
William Thomsonplayed in the development of his interest in the axiomatic method. He contrasts the abstract theory of Arrovian social choice with the axiomatic study of concrete models of resource allocation. He discusses how the study of how to adjudicate conflicting claims can serve as an introduction to the field of economic design.EXCEL 发表于 2025-3-30 17:39:17
John C. Harsanyi University of Budapest on errors in philosophical arguments. We then moved on to his training in economics at the University of Sydney, his first position at the University of Queensland, and his move to Stanford to study game theory with Kenneth Arrow, who was the adviser for his PhD dissertation蛤肉 发表于 2025-3-30 22:41:16
Paul A. Samuelsontions on the formative stages of their seminal work, their current views on the past and present states of the art, and their perspectives on the agendas to be pursued in this branch of normative economics officially on record.朝圣者 发表于 2025-3-31 01:02:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2378/237792/237792_55.pngMelanocytes 发表于 2025-3-31 05:29:02
John Broome, as well as more applied topics such as health measurement or climate change. He reflects on utilitarianism and prioritarianism and questions the latter’s approach to the moral valuation of wellbeing. He revisits Harsanyi’s aggregation theorem and its generalization to betterness relations, as wellBasal-Ganglia 发表于 2025-3-31 11:10:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2378/237792/237792_57.pngMeditate 发表于 2025-3-31 14:01:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2378/237792/237792_58.png