Conduit
发表于 2025-3-25 05:00:39
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57882-2tions on the formative stages of their seminal work, their current views on the past and present states of the art, and their perspectives on the agendas to be pursued in this branch of normative economics officially on record.
BLA
发表于 2025-3-25 10:43:17
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58169-3oves and Hugo Sonnenschein, his collaborations with Prasanta Pattanaik, Federico Valenciano and others, his work on strategy-proofness, restricted domains and stochastic choice. He describes the development of economics in recent times in Spain, with, in particular, the organization of the world mee
讽刺滑稽戏剧
发表于 2025-3-25 15:38:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2378/237792/237792_23.png
Picks-Disease
发表于 2025-3-25 16:08:21
Confucian and Daoist Virtue Ethicshe evokes her collaboration with David Gale and Ahmet Alkan, her work on coalition formation, her joint work with Michel Balinski on bi-divisor methods (which is applied in apportionment in Switzerland).
箴言
发表于 2025-3-25 23:11:08
Against Idealization in Virtue Ethics developed in utility theory, measurement theory and social choice, but also for contributions to more applied domains such as voting (in particular for his joint work with Steve Brams on approval voting). He explains why he neglected game theory by the kind of formalism he was familiar with.
小溪
发表于 2025-3-26 00:10:55
Virtue Ethics in the Medieval Periodource of inspiration. Gibbard’s graduate studies at Harvard are recalled with special attention given to the Arrow-Rawls-Sen seminar. The transitivity of social preference and rights in social choice are discussed. Gibbard’s contributions to strategy-proof social choice (the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Th
下边深陷
发表于 2025-3-26 07:07:04
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59693-2inor adjustments later in 2018. Apart from some personal history, topics discussed include: (i) social choice, especially with interpersonal comparisons of utility; (ii) utilitarianism, including Harsanyi’s contributions; (iii) consequentialism in decision theory and in ethics; (iv) the independence
cortex
发表于 2025-3-26 09:33:28
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59780-9played in the development of his interest in the axiomatic method. He contrasts the abstract theory of Arrovian social choice with the axiomatic study of concrete models of resource allocation. He discusses how the study of how to adjudicate conflicting claims can serve as an introduction to the fie
bile648
发表于 2025-3-26 13:18:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2378/237792/237792_29.png
杀虫剂
发表于 2025-3-26 17:26:53
Marc Fleurbaey,Maurice SallesPresents conversations with the founding fathers of modern social choice and welfare theory.Offers brief history of social choice and welfare theory.Includes interviews with Nobel Laureates, such as K