心神不宁
发表于 2025-3-28 17:43:59
Scalar Implicatures with Alternative Semanticsmatrix-level sets of alternatives), it can generate correct scalar implicatures while avoiding several problems proposed in prior literature. The problems solved include implicature generation when a quantifier appears in a disjunction (Chierchia .) and when a sentence includes complex quantifiers like “more than two” (Krifka .).
META
发表于 2025-3-28 22:00:00
Evaluation, Perception and Reflectionstivity condition that exactly one disjunct holds. CT and CF constructions are cross-linguistically witnessed. CF, in parallelism with ALT-Q, may shed some light on the problematic exceptions to suspension of scalar implicatures in DE contexts such as antecedents of conditionals, and similar problems as well.
知识
发表于 2025-3-28 23:07:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2372/237163/237163_43.png
不能根除
发表于 2025-3-29 06:54:20
Evaluation, Perception and Reflectionbe referentially identified). The referential identification of a set consists in the exhaustive listing of its members—hence the exhaustivity of focus. It is claimed that this analysis also accounts for properties of focus movement constructions that current alternative theories cannot explain.
玷污
发表于 2025-3-29 10:59:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2372/237163/237163_45.png
删除
发表于 2025-3-29 12:26:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2372/237163/237163_46.png
词汇
发表于 2025-3-29 17:14:15
0924-4670 l, state-of-the-art views on central topics in linguistic reA group of authors containing both leading authorities and young researchers addresses a number of issues of contrastiveness, polarity items and exhaustivity, quantificational expressions and the implicatures they generate, and the interact
forebear
发表于 2025-3-29 23:28:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2372/237163/237163_48.png
granite
发表于 2025-3-30 01:49:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2372/237163/237163_49.png
abstemious
发表于 2025-3-30 04:24:16
Grenzwerte, Stetigkeit, Differenziation, similar to English . and the additive particle –., which is similar to .. Furthermore, to account for the difference between –. and . or ., I assume that –. in –. introduces an additive presupposition weaker than that of ., . or ..