broach 发表于 2025-3-21 19:09:14
书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Context, Cognition and Conditionals读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0236882<br><br> <br><br>教义 发表于 2025-3-21 21:58:15
Conditional Sentences, Conditional Thoughts,s? And if so, (ii) what are these truth conditions? This chapter begins by revisiting familiar arguments against the material conditional as a psychologically plausible basis for the semantics of conditionals. It also defends the assumption that conditionals lend themselves to a truth-conditional tr领导权 发表于 2025-3-22 01:06:20
Biscuit Conditionals, Conditional Speech Acts and Speech-Act Conditionals,dentifies a number of criteria by which biscuit conditionals are typically distinguished, before examining various types of biscuit conditionals, including conditional speech acts, metalinguistic conditionals, and directive .-clauses. It concludes that the dividing line between hypothetical conditio强壮 发表于 2025-3-22 05:17:48
Beyond the Conditional Sentence and Towards Cognitive Reality,theory of conditionals in discourse has to kick the object of semantic study beyond that of the sentence to the level of speech acts. It provides a brief history of the debate regarding the degree to which context can inform truth-conditional content before proposing the radical contextualist theorymeritorious 发表于 2025-3-22 10:35:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236882/236882_5.pngCLIFF 发表于 2025-3-22 15:46:17
In Search of Linguistic and Contextual Constraints on Primary Meanings, theoretical tools of Default Semantics. It starts by specifying the main sources of information that take us from an .-conditional to its primary meaning in discourse. It then moves to familiar debates on the indicative-subjunctive distinction, and on the role of conditional perfection (the tendencCLIFF 发表于 2025-3-22 19:20:35
Towards a Pragmatic Category of Conditionals,onditional thoughts, and non-conditional sentences expressing conditional thoughts. Two criteria are offered for inclusion in the pragmatic category using the notions of restriction and remoteness. Cross-linguistic evidence provides support for the pragmatic category, as there are languages lackingironic 发表于 2025-3-22 22:21:18
Concluding Remarks: The Need for a Contextualist Outlook on the Study of Conditionals,rom the single sentence form ‘if ., .’. It summarises the main arguments that these key findings lead to, including the role of the conditional sentence in relation to the broader conceptual category in which it sits that accounts for the multiplicity of ways in which conditional thoughts can be exp围裙 发表于 2025-3-23 03:28:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13799-1truth conditions; conditional utterances; sentences; meanings; semantic theory; syntactic structures; IntePlatelet 发表于 2025-3-23 05:55:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236882/236882_10.png