发起 发表于 2025-3-23 12:47:50
Chi-Hé ElderForegrounds the importance of analysing meaning in interaction at the level of thought, using conditionals as a case study.Offers a fresh perspective on the way that conditionality should be conceptuaaddict 发表于 2025-3-23 17:56:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236882/236882_12.png极小量 发表于 2025-3-23 21:30:17
Context, Cognition and Conditionals978-3-030-13799-1Series ISSN 2946-2576 Series E-ISSN 2946-2584婚姻生活 发表于 2025-3-24 01:47:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236882/236882_14.png极力证明 发表于 2025-3-24 05:46:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236882/236882_15.png引起痛苦 发表于 2025-3-24 10:05:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236882/236882_16.png协议 发表于 2025-3-24 14:44:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236882/236882_17.pngessential-fats 发表于 2025-3-24 15:46:56
Applications of Vision-Based Interaction,cate. It proposes a six-way classification of conditional .-sentences as they are used in discourse. The classification maintains the familiar ‘hypothetical’ versus ‘biscuit’ conditional division, but inclusion in these categories is not dependent on a contingency relation between . and . as they arDawdle 发表于 2025-3-24 19:05:22
Laure Berti-Équille,Javier Borge-Holthoefer theoretical tools of Default Semantics. It starts by specifying the main sources of information that take us from an .-conditional to its primary meaning in discourse. It then moves to familiar debates on the indicative-subjunctive distinction, and on the role of conditional perfection (the tendenc完成才会征服 发表于 2025-3-24 23:18:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01855-8onditional thoughts, and non-conditional sentences expressing conditional thoughts. Two criteria are offered for inclusion in the pragmatic category using the notions of restriction and remoteness. Cross-linguistic evidence provides support for the pragmatic category, as there are languages lacking