手套
发表于 2025-3-21 16:23:00
书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Content and Consciousness Revisited读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0236801<br><br> <br><br>
烦扰
发表于 2025-3-21 20:57:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17374-0Conscious-state anti-realism; Daniel Dennett; Dennett‘s Content and Consciousness; Dennett‘s dual-level
STALE
发表于 2025-3-22 02:50:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_3.png
Slit-Lamp
发表于 2025-3-22 07:09:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_4.png
sphincter
发表于 2025-3-22 10:17:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_5.png
冒号
发表于 2025-3-22 14:21:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_6.png
冒号
发表于 2025-3-22 20:40:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_7.png
厌烦
发表于 2025-3-22 21:29:45
Hebert Montegranario,Jairo Espinosa argues that in that book Dennett reported a scientifically significant discovery about what minds are. This initially seems implausible, because at first sight . presents as an exercise in pure philosophical analysis of everyday discourse about the mental, and that is a profoundly unlikely method f
宏伟
发表于 2025-3-23 04:30:44
S. David Hudnall M.D., F.C.A.P.ver, as I argue in this paper, both sides of this debate agreed on a basic assumption: that the truth (or falsehood) of our ascription of propositional attitudes has direct ontological implications four our theories about their nature. In the current paper I argue that such an assumption is false, a
AVID
发表于 2025-3-23 07:21:45
S. David Hudnall M.D., F.C.A.P.s a relatively neglected aspect of this framework – the treatment of thinking and reasoning in Chap. VIII. Here Dennett distinguishes two senses of “thinking”, parallel to the senses of “awareness” distinguished earlier in the book. In one sense “thinking” refers to sub-personal information processi