相一致 发表于 2025-3-25 05:28:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_21.png

供过于求 发表于 2025-3-25 10:27:54

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_22.png

使熄灭 发表于 2025-3-25 14:46:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_23.png

讥讽 发表于 2025-3-25 17:29:51

Janet L. Denlinger PhD,Endre A. Balazs MDth of the realist’s defining claims. I argue that Dennett’s view of consciousness is best read as an anti-realism that affirms the existence of consciousness while denying an important independence claim.

积云 发表于 2025-3-25 22:06:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_25.png

呼吸 发表于 2025-3-26 01:09:40

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_26.png

暴发户 发表于 2025-3-26 05:57:31

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_27.png

Annotate 发表于 2025-3-26 12:05:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_28.png

多余 发表于 2025-3-26 15:37:44

http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2369/236801/236801_29.png

Ambiguous 发表于 2025-3-26 16:53:05

Hebert Montegranario,Jairo Espinosaosopher (qua philosopher) can aspire: unification of empirical findings. The chapter then argues that because . does not try to integrate its unifying suggestions with any considerations from physics, it fails to offer a satisfying metaphysical account of the mental, even though most philosophical r
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Content and Consciousness Revisited; With Replies by Dani Carlos Muñoz-Suárez,Felipe De Brigard Book 2015 Springer International Publishing