Embolism
发表于 2025-3-21 19:18:27
书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Consuming Cultural Hegemony读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0236226<br><br> <br><br>
不真
发表于 2025-3-21 22:13:38
From Partition to Hegemony: Bangladesh and Bangladeshi Films in the South Asian Context, in Dhaka were not seen as problematic or hegemonic. Soon after partition, India’s films in Pakistan began to be treated as foreign films and taxes were imposed on them. Following the Indo-Pakistan war of 1965, the Pakistani government imposed a ban on Indian films. With the creation of Bangladesh, the ban was re-imposed, and it continues today.
广大
发表于 2025-3-22 01:18:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2363/236226/236226_3.png
Freeze
发表于 2025-3-22 08:22:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2363/236226/236226_4.png
Benign
发表于 2025-3-22 10:21:58
Book 2020 sociology, film, media, communication, and cultural studies to explore the concepts of hegemony, circulation, viewership, cultural taste, and South Asian cultural history and politics. . .
Anguish
发表于 2025-3-22 16:32:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2363/236226/236226_6.png
Anguish
发表于 2025-3-22 17:17:22
umption and India’s regional hegemonic power and its relatio.This book examines the circulation and viewership of Bollywood films and filmi modernity in Bangladesh. The writer poses a number of fundamental questions: what it means to be a Bangladeshi in South Asia, what it means to be a Bangladeshi
GENUS
发表于 2025-3-22 23:15:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11609-5 in Dhaka were not seen as problematic or hegemonic. Soon after partition, India’s films in Pakistan began to be treated as foreign films and taxes were imposed on them. Following the Indo-Pakistan war of 1965, the Pakistani government imposed a ban on Indian films. With the creation of Bangladesh, the ban was re-imposed, and it continues today.
PTCA635
发表于 2025-3-23 03:42:16
Warum Mehr Armut in Deutschland?d power. The representation of Bangladeshi history in Indian films and the circulation of Indian films via theatrical means sometimes collide with Bangladeshi nationalist discourses and the economic interests of various groups.
separate
发表于 2025-3-23 08:10:02
ny. The book draws on relevant literature from anthropology, sociology, film, media, communication, and cultural studies to explore the concepts of hegemony, circulation, viewership, cultural taste, and South Asian cultural history and politics. . .978-3-030-31709-6978-3-030-31707-2