Animosity
发表于 2025-3-21 17:46:42
书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0235533<br><br> <br><br>
充满装饰
发表于 2025-3-21 23:17:43
Book 2020analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary..
Decline
发表于 2025-3-22 01:47:47
Conclusions Involving the Relationship Between Congress and the Courts,bicameral behavior is offered next, which presents a comparison between the House and Senate results. Further areas to examine are then presented, followed by a brief account of the future relationship between Congress and the Courts.
使隔离
发表于 2025-3-22 08:15:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2356/235533/235533_4.png
对手
发表于 2025-3-22 08:51:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2356/235533/235533_5.png
Neuropeptides
发表于 2025-3-22 16:02:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2356/235533/235533_6.png
Neuropeptides
发表于 2025-3-22 18:38:17
Reported Court Curbing and Administrative Court Curbing Measures,e quantitative results, which reveal that in general the House responds to polarization, while the Senate responds to the Court’s agenda, and judicial review. Interestingly, administrative court curbing, which are attempts by Congress to insulate the executive from judicial review, reveal similar outcomes.
modest
发表于 2025-3-22 22:37:14
Reported Court Structuring Bills,ring ideologically divisive times with the Court. An alternate explanation is that Congress may add judges and/or courts based on the administrative needs of the federal judiciary. The quantitative results support the ideological/partisan explanation.
河潭
发表于 2025-3-23 05:02:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2356/235533/235533_9.png
Explicate
发表于 2025-3-23 09:00:55
slation from the perspective of the judiciary committees.Ana.This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability