几何学家
发表于 2025-3-23 10:37:55
Extra-Territorial Confiscations,eater unanimity. Thus the validity of extra-territorial confiscations is with few exceptions. rejected by the case law. This is not to be wondered at. When a government aims at extending such a drastic violation of the principle of protection of private property beyond its frontiers, the foreign . w
上腭
发表于 2025-3-23 15:42:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235316/235316_12.png
Chagrin
发表于 2025-3-23 20:36:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235316/235316_13.png
胆大
发表于 2025-3-23 23:41:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8915-6Germany; international law; private international law
无底
发表于 2025-3-24 04:51:41
978-94-011-8240-9Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1956
青石板
发表于 2025-3-24 09:25:29
Daniel Ankarloo Ph.D.,Torbjörn Friberg Ph.D.e political and philosophic background of the . and despite the fact that it was preceded by extensive expropriations without compensation in the course of the French revolution., it can hardly be denied that the idea thus formulated and subsequently adopted in the French Constitution of 1791, in th
Generosity
发表于 2025-3-24 13:16:04
Geoffrey Sherington,Craig Campbellhe question of validity may appear in different ways. Most frequent is the following case. The confiscating state, or its assignee, exports the confiscated goods and an action for recovery is brought before a foreign court either against the confiscating state, where the latter still claims a title
BRAVE
发表于 2025-3-24 16:24:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2354/235316/235316_18.png
Salivary-Gland
发表于 2025-3-24 22:42:26
Victoria-María MacDonald,Mark Nillesntries contains concrete rules in this respect. It is even remarkable that in England and the United States where common law plays the major role, part of the questions connected with confiscation are covered by legislation., which is not the case in most other countries. Judges therefore have taken
一起
发表于 2025-3-25 02:42:20
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603462tandards. Some decisions proved to have confined themselves to the case at issue; in others, however, more general principles were laid down. Since legislation on this point is lacking in most countries we framed some rules which should be regarded as self-supporting rules of private international l