Evolve
发表于 2025-3-25 03:24:29
Hegel: The Entanglements of the Present,s, however, become such a “hot” topic that in many cases technological change is interpreted as change involving information technology. This is unfortunate as technological change (of course) is vastly more diversified. There are other important major trends, in Norway the obvious example is the de
精美食品
发表于 2025-3-25 10:22:32
Marx: Freeing Ourselves from Ourselves,aused by automation, by means of reforming the educational system and introducing specific training measurements? It has been proposed to overcome employees’ adaption to automation process on the one hand and to gain certain perspectives for their interests on the other hand. The starting point of t
摊位
发表于 2025-3-25 14:55:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2346/234572/234572_23.png
RACE
发表于 2025-3-25 19:10:02
Treatment and Management of FXTAS,le of information as an organizational resource is not very well understood, especially as it is related to the organization’s environment. What does appear is that computerized information systems have become a facilitating technology that interacts with organizational, historical, and environmenta
前奏曲
发表于 2025-3-25 22:26:17
Radiological Findings in FXTAS, development in this technological field. The conflicts which became apparent so far seem to center more on “qualitative” impacts (like degradation of traditional skills). The employment effects of computer systems, nevertheless, are at least in the longrun overwhelmingly negative, in the short-run
Diaphragm
发表于 2025-3-26 03:54:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2346/234572/234572_26.png
使虚弱
发表于 2025-3-26 07:43:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2346/234572/234572_27.png
尖牙
发表于 2025-3-26 10:19:32
IFIP State-of-the-Art Reportshttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/234572.jpg
BLANC
发表于 2025-3-26 14:07:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2346/234572/234572_29.png
窝转脊椎动物
发表于 2025-3-26 20:49:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97101-3) paradigm, including the conservative myth of the “one best way”. If we want to solve the dilemna “how not to be luddist ?”. We show -using the case of bank workers- that we need a radical change of organisational and cultural paradigms; and first a new definition of work, workers, jobs and production.