Banister 发表于 2025-3-23 11:40:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2318/231743/231743_11.pngRestenosis 发表于 2025-3-23 14:49:21
Calculating FRAND Licensing Fees: A Proposal of Basic Pro-competitive Criteria,s whose technical contributions have been declared standard-essential. This implies the acknowledgement of the superior constitutional rank of the pro-competition objective, of primarily collective interest, vis-à-vis the owners’ compensation, of primarily private interest. In turn, this should lead失误 发表于 2025-3-23 21:44:03
Selected Issues in SEP Licensing in Europe: The Antitrust Perspective,mmission’s decisions in Motorola and Samsung clarify what constitutes a FRAND offer. Second, it is unclear whether the SEP-holder can meet its duty to make a FRAND offer by offering a licence to its portfolio of SEPs rather than a licence to the specific asserted SEPs. Third, there is still no guidaHIKE 发表于 2025-3-23 23:15:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2318/231743/231743_14.png小卷发 发表于 2025-3-24 05:03:50
Standard Setting Organizations and Competition Laws: Lessons and Suggestions from the United Statess and create greater certainty and efficiency.It shows how American antitrust laws and similar competition laws can provide SSOs greater freedom than often believed to, for example, establish maximum royalty rates and determine mandatory licensing terms for SEPs.The chapter concludes with recommendafetter 发表于 2025-3-24 08:13:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2318/231743/231743_16.pngoffense 发表于 2025-3-24 12:35:19
Ashish Bharadwaj,Vishwas H. Devaiah,Indranath GuptIncludes contributions by respected academics and experienced legal practitioners.Provides varied perspectives on standard essential patent (SEP) related issues in the information and communications tPalter 发表于 2025-3-24 17:49:12
http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/231743.jpgKinetic 发表于 2025-3-24 21:25:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2318/231743/231743_19.png托运 发表于 2025-3-25 02:28:05
The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018