defendant
发表于 2025-3-26 21:23:30
Economic Growth and People’s Livelihoodeat and Thomas Aquinas. The texts that they devoted to this theological virtue show to what extent the true good of human beings can only be understood in a social and political dimension: individual good can only be achieved if the faithful put their own personal interest behind the love of God and
直觉没有
发表于 2025-3-27 04:09:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230281/230281_32.png
BIBLE
发表于 2025-3-27 09:11:58
Social Development and Quality of Lifef the individual. Throughout his moral and political writings, he did, however, provide a sketch of his views regarding the general nature of the common good, defined as what is to be preserved by the laws of human communities as well as regarding the way in which this can be applied concretely. Mos
昆虫
发表于 2025-3-27 10:54:30
Economic Growth and People’s Livelihoode of these works is motivated by the fact that they represent the final – and most mature – phase of the English Franciscan’s political reflection. Relying on the findings of previous scholarship, the author believes it is appropriate to focus on the use of the expression rather than on a determinat
milligram
发表于 2025-3-27 14:34:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230281/230281_35.png
Esalate
发表于 2025-3-27 19:36:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230281/230281_36.png
thwart
发表于 2025-3-27 22:41:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230281/230281_37.png
极小
发表于 2025-3-28 04:21:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2303/230281/230281_38.png
Medicaid
发表于 2025-3-28 06:27:03
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286436 in England and continental Europe. This chapter compares how two of Hobbes’s immediate successors and critics – Richard Cumberland and Samuel Pufendorf – dealt with the potential conflict between self-interest and the requirements of natural law. The chapter shows how both intended to reply to Hobb
Magnificent
发表于 2025-3-28 12:43:30
Market Economy and the Intellectuals, utilitarianism, and—my main focus—Scottish social thought from Adam Smith and others. My aim is twofold. First, historically, I lay out the conceptual field for the early modern relation of self-interest and the common good while giving special attention to Scottish innovations. Second, from a phi