Radiculopathy 发表于 2025-3-23 11:52:47
Where Do We Stand?,nces of the conceptual separation of knowledge and action. Its conceptual design marks the standard in terms of the type of problems that any conception relating knowledge, nature, and action must tackle until today.MEEK 发表于 2025-3-23 17:39:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2286/228586/228586_12.png围巾 发表于 2025-3-23 21:58:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05340-5lly used to set up research cooperations with the natural sciences. He also debates the much-hyped concept of transdisciplinarity and discusses the question of whether coevolutionary science may itself be viewed as a perspective of knowledge production.defray 发表于 2025-3-24 01:17:17
Coevolutionary Science,fect. Subsequently, various concepts and ideas are combined to outline an understanding of reality which opens up possibilities of sustainable development and unfolds the meaning of coevolutionary research.重画只能放弃 发表于 2025-3-24 06:23:04
Perspectives of Coevolutionary Science in Sustainability Discourse,lly used to set up research cooperations with the natural sciences. He also debates the much-hyped concept of transdisciplinarity and discusses the question of whether coevolutionary science may itself be viewed as a perspective of knowledge production.Champion 发表于 2025-3-24 07:49:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2286/228586/228586_16.png鄙视 发表于 2025-3-24 11:49:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2286/228586/228586_17.png不透气 发表于 2025-3-24 17:48:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2286/228586/228586_18.pngOCTO 发表于 2025-3-24 19:19:22
Book 2019volution is needed to explore paths to a sustainable future. Jens Jetzkowitz initially discusses why social science knowledge only rarely finds its way into sustainability discourse. One significant issue is a view of science that separates knowing and acting, and the book illustrates current proble发展 发表于 2025-3-25 02:56:01
What Is the Problem?,f these questions, Jetzkowitz draw attention to the relationship of conceptual thinking, future expectation, and action by discussing Marx’ and Engels’ methodological approach to society and history. What becomes evident here is that it is crucial for sustainability discourse to consider knowledge a