indigenous 发表于 2025-3-25 04:22:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2269/226835/226835_21.pngdeciduous 发表于 2025-3-25 10:58:22
Tolerance and Neutrality in Civic and Religious Education,rance in any society is structured by people’s and groups’ asymmetrical relations to political power/statehood. Hence, these have to be assessed to understand both the meaning and practice of tolerance. Moreover, the chapter deconstructs the triadic logic of the subject of tolerant and neutralist political regimes.fatuity 发表于 2025-3-25 12:40:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2269/226835/226835_23.png制定 发表于 2025-3-25 17:28:18
Peter StrandbrinkArgues that strains will inevitably surface between competing interests of a liberal democratic approach to education and a state‘s interest in civic education.Highlights the internal inconsistenciesobjection 发表于 2025-3-25 23:51:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2269/226835/226835_25.pngAgnosia 发表于 2025-3-26 03:25:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55798-4Citizenship; Social Cohesion; Cultural Pluralism; Religious Education; Tolerance; Borders; Political State肿块 发表于 2025-3-26 08:10:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2269/226835/226835_27.png询问 发表于 2025-3-26 10:15:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2269/226835/226835_28.png灯泡 发表于 2025-3-26 13:49:18
R. Michael Feener,Philip Fountain,Robin Bushand political views of European civic-normative education the study brings to attention the fact that states are typically not the monolithic agents capable of driving hard civic-normative agendas they are made out to be. Standard conceptions of liberal democratic statehood are thus seldom very sophmusicologist 发表于 2025-3-26 18:13:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49031-6ogy. Thus, subject and object positions are scripted as distinct; states (and stakeholders) expected to plan, guide, monitor, and assess policy; and receivers (citizens, residents, pupils, teachers, schools, professionals, institutions, and entire populations) of policy to absorb and realise it in l