琐碎 发表于 2025-3-28 15:11:55

Kurt Lücke,Rolf Rixen,Ursula Schmidtng double referent of “it,” understood both as the Shakespearean text and as the new contemporary work. Contrary to conventional wisdom, I argue that the more it changes, the more it is not the same thing. Quotation is transformation; citing means making changes.

补充 发表于 2025-3-28 22:00:30

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2268/226712/226712_42.png

Tractable 发表于 2025-3-29 00:05:06

,Paul Robeson’s Othello and the Question of a Multicultural Shakespeare,emotional euphoria that resists critical analysis. it is impossible not to feel moved by the exuberance of Robeson’s claim. Yet it is equally hard to avoid wincing at the quality of overstatement in his declaration. Our dilemma involves the copresence of two stories, one celebratory and the other skeptical: both stories must be told.

arterioles 发表于 2025-3-29 05:14:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2268/226712/226712_44.png

Charade 发表于 2025-3-29 10:50:42

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2268/226712/226712_45.png

歌唱队 发表于 2025-3-29 14:51:19

10楼

gregarious 发表于 2025-3-29 16:39:50

10楼
页: 1 2 3 4 [5]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Citing Shakespeare; The Reinterpretation Peter Erickson Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2007 culture.Englis