胆小懦夫
发表于 2025-3-23 12:57:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225857/225857_11.png
大炮
发表于 2025-3-23 17:16:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225857/225857_12.png
CONE
发表于 2025-3-23 21:28:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225857/225857_13.png
自爱
发表于 2025-3-23 23:33:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225857/225857_14.png
stroke
发表于 2025-3-24 04:35:16
Allianz China General Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Youda (Shanghai) International Freight Co., Ltd. et al, Ltd. and others, for damage to three radiators and three drivepipes that were received damaged at the port of destination. The Plaintiff argued that improper stacking of the containers resulted in the damage to the goods, but the Defendants argued that improper internal packaging and a storm cause
bizarre
发表于 2025-3-24 08:31:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225857/225857_16.png
珊瑚
发表于 2025-3-24 13:13:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225857/225857_17.png
系列
发表于 2025-3-24 15:07:01
China Shipping Logistics Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Zhongtai Bridge Steel Structure Co., Ltd.,r the Defendant delayed payment of freight and refused to return the bid bond that the Plaintiff had prepaid. The court found for the Plaintiff, awarding it damages for unpaid freight and for interest on the late payments of freight.
GRILL
发表于 2025-3-24 22:36:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225857/225857_19.png
ARY
发表于 2025-3-25 00:06:20
COSCO Container Lines Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Finigate Integrated Logistics Co., Ltd. Qingdao Branch to contain solid waste, which is prohibited by the state from being imported. The goods were not taken for delivery. The Plaintiff asserted that the four Defendants were jointly and severally liable for the container detention fee of RMB561,015, together with interest and court fees, claiming the Fi