发炎
发表于 2025-3-30 11:24:29
,Chaozhou Asia–Pacific Energy Co., Ltd. v. Hua Yang International Marine Transportation Co., Ltd. etThis is the judgment of first instance and the judgment of second instance is on page 199.
夹克怕包裹
发表于 2025-3-30 15:50:41
CHEN Linglong et al. v. Ping An Property & Casualty Insurance Company of China Ltd. Tianjin Branch The Plaintiff shipowner contracted to acquire vessel insurance from two Defendant insurers. When Plaintiff’s vessel, M/V “Jin Ye 88” encountered a storm that occasioned total loss of the ship, the Plaintiffs filed an insurance claim to recover the value for which they had contracted.
放逐某人
发表于 2025-3-30 20:24:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225854/225854_53.png
抵制
发表于 2025-3-30 22:55:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225854/225854_54.png
BRINK
发表于 2025-3-31 02:22:40
Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. v. Alpha Elephant Inc. et al.,(2014) Xia Hai Fa Ren Zi No. 14
Barrister
发表于 2025-3-31 05:17:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225854/225854_56.png
得体
发表于 2025-3-31 12:39:00
Foshan Feitu Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. DHL Global Forwarding (China) Co., Ltd. Foshan Branch e(2013) Guang Hai Fa Chu Zi No. 492
佛刊
发表于 2025-3-31 15:48:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63239-0Chinese maritime case; Chinese maritime judgment; Chinese case; Chinese judgment; Maritime case; Maritime
难解
发表于 2025-3-31 19:47:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225854/225854_59.png
粗鲁性质
发表于 2025-3-31 23:40:49
Martin Davies,Jiang LinOffers selected Chinese maritime judgments.Provides insights of how Chinese maritime courts apply Chinese maritime law in practice.Assists foreign parties to make wise decision on how to manage their