小溪
发表于 2025-3-26 23:06:34
Stochastic Policy Iteration Methods two others, Zhejiang Jiaolong Group Co., Ltd. and Chenye Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., for breach of contract. Plaintiff entered into two Floating Capital Loan Contracts with CEIEC Ningbo for RMB 77 million and RMB 40 million plus interest, respectively.
饮料
发表于 2025-3-27 02:26:25
Denis Belomestny,John Schoenmakersendant initially paid 180,000 USD to the Plaintiff, and disputed its liability to pay the remaining 896,078.75 USD, arguing that the cost was excessive. The court rejected the Defendant’s evidence that the cost of repairs was excessive and found for the Plaintiff.
多样
发表于 2025-3-27 05:59:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225854/225854_33.png
失眠症
发表于 2025-3-27 11:33:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13093-1intiff filed suit for the realization (foreclosure) of the ship’s mortgage, and asked the court to compel auction or sale of the vessel in order to repay the Defendant’s outstanding debts, and to give the Plaintiff priority over other claims in repayment from the proceeds of sale.
用不完
发表于 2025-3-27 14:54:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225854/225854_35.png
forecast
发表于 2025-3-27 19:20:42
Sukhpreet Kaur,Yogesh Kumar,Sushil Kumaro the Defendant carrier’s ship in Brazil was alleged to be lacking in weight upon delivery in Shanghai. The Defendant argued that the difference in weight, as measured in wet metric tons, was due to the quality of the iron ore, which naturally drained off water weight during the voyage to Shanghai.
宽容
发表于 2025-3-28 01:54:57
Problems in Bending of Bars and Plates,the Defendant’s ship after it had been struck while at anchor by another ship. The Plaintiff sought to recover 5% of the cargo losses from the Defendant, on the basis that this was the Defendant’s share of responsibility for the sinking. The Plaintiff argued that the Defendant had overloaded the shi
天气
发表于 2025-3-28 05:19:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225854/225854_38.png
思想流动
发表于 2025-3-28 09:08:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22359-4 repair costs and lost wages, from a collision that occurred on May 18, 2010 against the Defendant, Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd. In response, Offshore Oil argued that some of the repairs made by the Plaintiff in South Africa were unreasonable, and could have been done for a much lower rate in
Libido
发表于 2025-3-28 14:19:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2259/225854/225854_40.png