lymphedema
发表于 2025-3-23 10:15:30
Stephen Karesh,Medhat Sam Gabriels clear that the Polish draft changed significantly during the ten years of negotiations. Not only was the wording of suggested articles altered, but several new items were also added to the catalogue of children’s rights. Accordingly, while the second Polish proposal was the main reference point fo
excrete
发表于 2025-3-23 15:58:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2253/225288/225288_12.png
cogitate
发表于 2025-3-23 18:20:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2253/225288/225288_13.png
cinder
发表于 2025-3-24 00:32:16
Transformations of the Statehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/225288.jpg
CHIDE
发表于 2025-3-24 05:03:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2253/225288/225288_15.png
seruting
发表于 2025-3-24 09:47:59
Power and Exclusion in Discourse Approaches to International Relations discourse-based approaches to IR contributes to the present heterogeneity of this field. However, it also encourages an opening up of the discipline towards debates and concepts from other areas of social inquiry.
集聚成团
发表于 2025-3-24 13:53:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2253/225288/225288_17.png
盖他为秘密
发表于 2025-3-24 17:12:19
Global Childhood — an Essentially Uncontested Concept?h would move this document to almost universal acceptance (with only Somalia not having ratified). When the Supreme Court made its decision, Justice Kennedy, speaking for the majority of the judges, stated ‘etribution is not proportional if the law’s most severe penalty is imposed on one whose cu
背叛者
发表于 2025-3-24 22:25:54
Origins of the Drafting of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Childtion supports the argument that ‘at least at the level of norm-creation there […] appears to exist a strong consensus among states as to the substance and universal applicability of the rights of the child’ (Harris-Short, 2003: 135). This also seems to be confirmed by the fact that the draft was ent
Congeal
发表于 2025-3-24 23:22:07
Discursive Practices within the UN and the Transformation of a Global Childhood Paradigm the Convention’s title that figured in the drafters’ discussions: (1) The rights-holder covered by the Convention: should it address ‘children’ as a group or the ‘child’ as an individual?. (2) The terminology used for the nature of rights contained in the possible Convention. Concerning the first q