Mindfulness
发表于 2025-3-25 07:08:10
Finite Element Method for Interior Problems,ing to deliberate’, the chapter argues, is congruent with feminist aims and is respectful of difference yet firmly committed to truth—a commitment critical for our so-called post-truth era. The chapter concludes by considering the limits of Gadamer’s account and the close ties between listening, solidarity and loss.
COW
发表于 2025-3-25 08:48:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2220/221999/221999_22.png
Junction
发表于 2025-3-25 12:24:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2220/221999/221999_23.png
裹住
发表于 2025-3-25 19:32:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2220/221999/221999_24.png
凶兆
发表于 2025-3-25 23:20:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2220/221999/221999_25.png
watertight,
发表于 2025-3-26 03:41:15
Donatella Occorsio,Woula Themistoclakisle interdependence. Arguing for the latter, the discussion reimagines both cosmopolitanism and care from the perspective of mutual dependencies highlighted by the migration crisis of Indian health care workers.
断断续续
发表于 2025-3-26 07:09:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2220/221999/221999_27.png
nocturnal
发表于 2025-3-26 09:37:43
Approximating Implicitly Defined Manifolds,rovides a bird-eye view of the existing proposals for a care-oriented public administration, with a focus on a recent discussion about the possibility of merging the values of care and bureaucracy in state and public sector institutions. Finally, the chapter suggests an empirically grounded care-oriented approach to governmental institutions.
迎合
发表于 2025-3-26 14:33:27
Democratic Practice and ‘Caring to Deliberate’: A Gadamerian Account of Conversation and Listeninging to deliberate’, the chapter argues, is congruent with feminist aims and is respectful of difference yet firmly committed to truth—a commitment critical for our so-called post-truth era. The chapter concludes by considering the limits of Gadamer’s account and the close ties between listening, solidarity and loss.
lobster
发表于 2025-3-26 17:28:50
Why the Publicly Funded Solution Is Better Equipped to Provide Democratic Care ‘For All’pending on whether we are interested in, first, particularised versus standardised solutions, in which case civil society is better able to meet ethical care demands. Or whether we are interested in equal access to care for all, in which case the state provides a better alternative than either the civil society or the market.