atopic
发表于 2025-3-25 06:20:39
Classical Discourse and British Imperial Identity: The Nature of Empire,l come as no surprise that close comparisons between classical antiquity and Britain’s imperial present were as common in the latter as the former. Nor is it surprising to find the same pre-occupation with the present and exploitation in the literature comprising the imperial annex of classical rece
低三下四之人
发表于 2025-3-25 10:51:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190973/190973_22.png
Ptsd429
发表于 2025-3-25 14:23:53
Classical Discourse and British Imperial Identity: The Imperial Character,t, or uphold when erected.’. This is familiar territory, where the comparison to Rome establishes or confirms the special magnificence of Britain’s Empire. But that was only the first step. Dicey continued, revealing still more of the conceptual imperial constellation bound up with classical discour
真实的人
发表于 2025-3-25 16:19:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190973/190973_24.png
meritorious
发表于 2025-3-25 23:43:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190973/190973_25.png
Conduit
发表于 2025-3-26 00:54:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190973/190973_26.png
Bone-Scan
发表于 2025-3-26 05:42:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190973/190973_27.png
玉米
发表于 2025-3-26 11:36:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190973/190973_28.png
buoyant
发表于 2025-3-26 14:33:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55531-2storically great. But the conclusion of Dicey’s thought carries us onto new ground, revealing the final element in the imperial nexus derived from classical discourse. As he put it ‘we too might well be bidden to remember that . is the talent committed to us.’. Romans and Britons shared the same rar
engagement
发表于 2025-3-26 18:09:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190973/190973_30.png