Metastasis
发表于 2025-3-26 22:24:13
The Poverty of Philosophy: Marx Meets Bourdieuturns away from the dominated as a source of social change and back to intellectuals and the realpolitik of reason which calls on the state and law to realize their claims to universality. Similarly, the failure of working-class revolution leads Marx to return to the logic of theory—the theory of th
Retrieval
发表于 2025-3-27 03:59:50
Marx/Bourdieu: Convergences and Tensions, Between Critical Sociology and Philosophy of Emancipation” and Marx’s hesitations between economism and constructivism are compared. The third field concerns the theory of praxis between the sociology of action and revolutionary politics. The fourth field concerns the political philosophy of emancipation, important in Marx’s approach, present but more mar
书法
发表于 2025-3-27 07:36:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190079/190079_33.png
进取心
发表于 2025-3-27 12:06:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190079/190079_34.png
透明
发表于 2025-3-27 14:15:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190079/190079_35.png
fructose
发表于 2025-3-27 18:20:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190079/190079_36.png
mercenary
发表于 2025-3-28 01:44:24
Bourdieu’s Lesson: Marx vs. Althusser?e first aim of this essay is to show that Bourdieu’s critique is in turn contradictory because he does exactly what he reproaches to Althusser, that is, he poses himself, in turn, as the unique and authentic interpreter of Marx’s text. The second purpose of the essay is to analyse Althusser’s respon
确定无疑
发表于 2025-3-28 02:35:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190079/190079_38.png
diathermy
发表于 2025-3-28 08:27:40
Sumita B. Khatri,Emily J. Penningtonhilosopher that the sociologist scatters throughout his works, and by the adoption of a critical perspective that denotes a massive Marxian presence. In the concatenated set of critiques underpinning the architecture of his work, in the plethora of questions he raises, and in the scientific practice
报复
发表于 2025-3-28 13:03:45
Inflammatory Pathways in Sarcoidosis,ury court aristocracy, transmitted to the urban bourgeoisie and then ultimately to the popular classes. Bourdieu, in his turn, addressed such an Eliasian “civilizing process” in various works, whilst emphasizing not just the State monopoly of violent power but also of symbolic power. Further, in his