恶心
发表于 2025-3-25 03:40:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190065/190065_21.png
ironic
发表于 2025-3-25 10:19:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190065/190065_22.png
Aspirin
发表于 2025-3-25 12:55:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190065/190065_23.png
Anterior
发表于 2025-3-25 19:03:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190065/190065_24.png
CRASS
发表于 2025-3-25 20:19:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190065/190065_25.png
Cerumen
发表于 2025-3-26 03:58:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1901/190065/190065_26.png
具体
发表于 2025-3-26 06:41:01
Energy transfer in concentrated systems,re cannot be one. Intuition seems to suggest that boundedness is a question of size: to be bounded is to be “small”, or in any event not too large, and every kernel that is smaller than a bounded one is itself bounded. Since kernels are complex-valued functions, “size” presumably refers to absolute
ferment
发表于 2025-3-26 09:40:54
Luminescence in Electrochemistryty operator on ..(ℝ.) (which is not an integral operator) and the tensor product of the identity operator on ..(ℤ.) with a projection of rank 1 on ..(II) (which is an integral operator). What is the essential difference between these two kinds of examples?
原来
发表于 2025-3-26 16:12:04
Luminescence of Biopolymers and Cellsators? The question refers to unitary equivalence; in precise terms, it asks for a characterization of those operators . on ..(.) for which there exists a unitary operator . on ..(.) such that .* is integral.
肥料
发表于 2025-3-26 18:26:35
Apparatus for Bioluminescence Measurements,ad of the existential one. In precise terms: under what conditions on an operator . on ..(.) does it happen that .* is an integral operator for every unitary . on ..(.)? When it does happen, the operator . will be called a . integral operator on ..(.).