Neuropeptides 发表于 2025-3-26 22:22:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1858/185747/185747_31.pngCUMB 发表于 2025-3-27 01:49:08
Dynamic Model and Parameter Measurementf Weisskopf’s (1967) distinction between “intensive” and “extensive” sciences. The distinction can be translated to an organizational analysis of old and transformed Big Science and used to reveal several additional key features of these labs and the sciences they serve. As the brief historical expo相反放置 发表于 2025-3-27 05:52:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1858/185747/185747_33.png言外之意 发表于 2025-3-27 09:36:41
Plenum Monographs in Nonlinear Physicsary science projects. As noted especially in Chaps. . and ., the primary areas of use of neutron scattering, synchrotron radiation, and free electron laser labs, and thus the ultimate motivation for their existence, are the materials and life sciences (broadly defined). The users are ordinary academExposition 发表于 2025-3-27 15:19:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58718-9eceding five chapters, in terms of a gradual abolishment of the Social Contract for Science and the Linear Model of Technological Innovation through “commodification” (Radder 2010), “economization” (Berman 2014), and a “strategic turn” (Irvine and Martin 1984). These concepts are complementary descrBIDE 发表于 2025-3-27 18:28:39
George Yadigaroglu,Geoffrey F. Hewittmbination of existing scientific, technological, political, and organizational assets. It took place largely—but not exclusively—within existing institutional frameworks, and depending on the viewpoint, these were thereby both changed and kept intact. Contrasting continuity and change is a powerfulanarchist 发表于 2025-3-28 00:13:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1858/185747/185747_37.pngconstitutional 发表于 2025-3-28 02:33:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1858/185747/185747_38.pngExclaim 发表于 2025-3-28 09:16:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1858/185747/185747_39.pnglaxative 发表于 2025-3-28 12:24:07
Yanbing Chen,Wei Ke,Hao Sheng,Zhang Xiongilar issues under consideration in the United States.. The move toward liberalization, however, does not free the national postal administration from the USO. In the United States the proposed reform (H.R. 22) reduces the monopoly limit but retains the USO unchanged. The EU goes further in making th