失望昨天 发表于 2025-3-26 21:53:26

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185218/185218_31.png

SAGE 发表于 2025-3-27 02:43:48

Normative Legal Positivism,een presented many times before, including by Lon Fuller and Jeremy Waldron. That is, when its ‘conceptual’ claims are reinterpreted as normative ones—ideals by which legal systems should be structured—then the theory makes far more sense. That is not to say it is correct as a normative theory; lega

创作 发表于 2025-3-27 06:49:50

Conclusion,s the flaws of legal positivism in that movement’s desire to make a ‘science’ of legal philosophy and also to avoid any entanglement in moral or political theory, given its inclination towards moral relativism. But if moral relativism is true, then the very project of law is incoherent; law is merel

orthodox 发表于 2025-3-27 11:23:04

9楼

使无效 发表于 2025-3-27 15:29:52

10楼

Spinal-Fusion 发表于 2025-3-27 18:27:25

10楼

门闩 发表于 2025-3-28 01:44:31

10楼

Infant 发表于 2025-3-28 04:23:26

10楼
页: 1 2 3 [4]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Beyond Legal Positivism; The Moral Authority Whitley R. P. Kaufman Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus