机会
发表于 2025-3-21 19:47:09
书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beyond Legal Positivism读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0185218<br><br> <br><br>
CANE
发表于 2025-3-22 00:02:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185218/185218_2.png
开玩笑
发表于 2025-3-22 04:09:39
Beyond Legal Positivism978-3-031-43868-4Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
IOTA
发表于 2025-3-22 06:19:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185218/185218_4.png
监禁
发表于 2025-3-22 10:32:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185218/185218_5.png
Fibroid
发表于 2025-3-22 14:20:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185218/185218_6.png
起草
发表于 2025-3-22 19:52:00
978-3-031-43870-7The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
Anticonvulsants
发表于 2025-3-23 00:50:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185218/185218_8.png
Largess
发表于 2025-3-23 02:44:31
Journalism Theories in Media Studies,ual analysis,’ a technique that identifies the necessary conceptual properties of law. We make the case that there is no good reason to believe in any such method, nor its claims to be uncovering ‘conceptual’ truths about the law.
inculpate
发表于 2025-3-23 06:26:53
Classifying International Normative Orders, law and morality, whether that be expressed through the Separability Thesis or the Social Fact Thesis (that law is a matter of social fact, not moral truth). We show how this doctrine is the fatal weakness of legal positivism, for it renders the theory unable to explain the concept of legal obligat