荣幸
发表于 2025-3-25 03:40:11
,Hegel’s Theory of Religious Knowledge,furt, and Jena. Although they are by no means self sufficient, due to Hegel’s tendency to summarize at times what he had worked out in detail elsewhere and to the fact that only the cosmological argument gets discussed, they remain, properly supplemented, the best guide to a systematic statement of his theory of religious knowledge.
AXIOM
发表于 2025-3-25 08:08:57
Book 1974narrow and abstract sense in which it has come to be understood since Locke and Kant. "The examination of knowledge," he holds, "can only be carried out by an act of knowledge," and "to seek to know before we know is as absurd as the wise resolution of Scholasticus, not to venture into the water unt
粗糙
发表于 2025-3-25 13:21:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1852/185181/185181_23.png
cloture
发表于 2025-3-25 17:39:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1852/185181/185181_24.png
VERT
发表于 2025-3-25 22:07:37
Dennis Campbell,Terry R. Wittlerwledge” and hermeneutics as such remains centered on the problem of ., one might expect that a rereading of Hegel in the light of these recent developments should reveal something of what is still alive and operative in his thought with regard to the so-called “problem of knowledge.”
Coeval
发表于 2025-3-26 02:07:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1852/185181/185181_26.png
Asseverate
发表于 2025-3-26 07:31:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1852/185181/185181_27.png
Ancestor
发表于 2025-3-26 11:35:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1852/185181/185181_28.png
投票
发表于 2025-3-26 15:06:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1852/185181/185181_29.png
lesion
发表于 2025-3-26 19:59:38
Hegel: How, and How Far, is Philosophy Possible?, turn, a cause. It is true that human reason (.) has Ideas (.) of the unconditioned, but these are mere thoughts which do not yield us knowledge of any object. Their function is at once to stimulate . and to restrict it to its proper cognitive function in cooperation with sensuous intuition. They me