固执已见
发表于 2025-3-21 19:13:42
书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Believing in Accordance with the Evidence读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0183329<br><br> <br><br>
留恋
发表于 2025-3-21 22:19:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183329/183329_2.png
密切关系
发表于 2025-3-22 04:12:59
Evidentialism, Time-Slice Mentalism, and Dreamless Sleepopportunity for them to clarify their views. Furthermore, the paper is not only relevant to evidentialists. For example, the arguments of this paper could give Time-Slice Mentalists a reason to deny evidentialism.
optic-nerve
发表于 2025-3-22 04:56:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183329/183329_4.png
全能
发表于 2025-3-22 11:09:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183329/183329_5.png
联邦
发表于 2025-3-22 16:14:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183329/183329_6.png
NOVA
发表于 2025-3-22 19:23:43
The Evidence in Evidentialisms if they abandon the evidence-first approach. I argue that it is more difficult than might initially appear to avoid the “regress or self-support” dilemma, and that the price for avoiding it is depriving oneself of the ability to explain how cases of both immediate and mediate justification involve the same unitary phenomenon of .
大包裹
发表于 2025-3-22 23:27:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183329/183329_8.png
BRAWL
发表于 2025-3-23 04:19:31
Forschungsmethodik und Ergebnisse,ese attitudes and relations. Finally, we examine the implications of our findings for the attitudes that a philosopher might take toward contentious philosophical theses. Evidentialism, our preferred view of epistemic justification, is helpful in clarifying the issues and addressing the problems.
Frenetic
发表于 2025-3-23 07:33:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183329/183329_10.png