FORGE
发表于 2025-3-21 19:14:29
书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0183307<br><br> <br><br>
Supplement
发表于 2025-3-21 23:03:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183307/183307_2.png
bromide
发表于 2025-3-22 03:39:49
Industrie 4.0 in der Textilproduktionherence, which shows how political and economic goals can bias the evaluation of evidence and produce irrational rejection of claims about global warming. Finally, we argue that explanatory coherence gives a better account of belief revision than major alternatives including logicist and Bayesian theories.
Panther
发表于 2025-3-22 05:50:25
Book 2011ly) in the light of new evidence. Yet these two areas of research have long seemed strangely detached from each other, as witnessed by the small number of cross-references and researchers working in both domains.One may speculate as to what has brought about this surprising, and perhaps unfortunate,
友好关系
发表于 2025-3-22 10:52:19
Dieter Steegmüller,Michael Zürnds. Finally, I argue that part of what feeds the functionalist-relationalist controversy is a false dilemma based on an implausible conception of what it means rationally to suspend judgment. Making this precise requires a formal framework that includes a representation of the agent’s research agenda.
显而易见
发表于 2025-3-22 14:56:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183307/183307_6.png
Enrage
发表于 2025-3-22 19:55:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183307/183307_7.png
Leaven
发表于 2025-3-23 00:49:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183307/183307_8.png
Jacket
发表于 2025-3-23 01:40:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183307/183307_9.png
Lumbar-Spine
发表于 2025-3-23 09:16:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183307/183307_10.png