expansive
发表于 2025-3-25 04:05:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181042/181042_21.png
excrete
发表于 2025-3-25 10:46:27
2662-3803 Overview: Basic income is one the most innovative, powerful and controversial proposals for addressing poverty and growing inequalities. This book examines the arguments for and against basic income from the point of view of economic and social justice.978-1-349-29562-3978-1-137-01542-6Series ISSN 2662-3803 Series E-ISSN 2662-3811
决定性
发表于 2025-3-25 13:00:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181042/181042_23.png
乳白光
发表于 2025-3-25 16:40:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53795-0 one accepts certain liberal-egalitarian starting points associated with the Rawlsian project. An unconditional set of universal social rights can be justified as a way of supporting a brute-luck-countering (maximin-guided, i.e., efficiency-sensitive) equalization of the freedom to do whatever one might want to do.
heartburn
发表于 2025-3-25 20:43:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181042/181042_25.png
Abbreviate
发表于 2025-3-26 03:43:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181042/181042_26.png
辩论的终结
发表于 2025-3-26 04:32:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181042/181042_27.png
incubus
发表于 2025-3-26 08:40:36
Periodization of the Hepu Han Tombs,-egalitarian demands discussed in chapter 2. Philippe Van Parijs’s way of arriving at his radical conclusion that justice requires “the highest sustainable” basic income rests heavily on one interesting and controversial argument, namely, that the so-called employment rents, accessed through favorab
EVEN
发表于 2025-3-26 13:27:08
Zwischen Sprache und Information II,ngness to work, may be superior to the work-tested minimum income programs of traditional welfare states. As discussed in the last two chapters, Philippe Van Parijs’s powerful neutrality-based justification of basic income argues that a universal arrangement of that kind serves to equalize access to
脱离
发表于 2025-3-26 19:22:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53795-0 one accepts certain liberal-egalitarian starting points associated with the Rawlsian project. An unconditional set of universal social rights can be justified as a way of supporting a brute-luck-countering (maximin-guided, i.e., efficiency-sensitive) equalization of the freedom to do whatever one m