谁在削木头
发表于 2025-3-23 10:26:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167720/167720_11.png
借喻
发表于 2025-3-23 14:41:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167720/167720_12.png
arousal
发表于 2025-3-23 19:42:59
Patients’ Rights at the End of Life in Chilean Juridical System. Legal and Jurisprudential Analysis onception of autonomy, which dwindles patients’ abilities of self-determination. Given such legal context, biolaw can play a key role in designing and establishing effective biojuridical models to solve conflicts between different moral values and visions, arisen in jurisdictional and para-jurisdict
LUT
发表于 2025-3-24 01:38:30
Research Ethics Committeeslisation. Lastly, I will provide some practical information as a member of two research ethics committees in Spain, the Bioethics Committee at the University of Barcelona and the Research Ethics Committee at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, to draw some conclusions and make proposals.
fertilizer
发表于 2025-3-24 03:51:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167720/167720_15.png
Ebct207
发表于 2025-3-24 07:12:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167720/167720_16.png
演绎
发表于 2025-3-24 13:24:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167720/167720_17.png
averse
发表于 2025-3-24 17:33:17
Introduction,ffered by the technological development daily pose new issues and challenges. Parliaments should intervene to accommodate this pluralism, but they are often late in providing rules, and courts have to stand in for them.
GOAT
发表于 2025-3-24 20:28:49
Professional Medical EthicsMEs from a comparative perspective, the present essay sketches some of the most significant and multifaceted interactions between the law and the CME, stressing how professional ethics is at the same time an element of axiological and legal pluralism (“inside” and “outside” the profession) and a tool that (potentially) accommodates pluralism.
wall-stress
发表于 2025-3-25 00:54:55
Patients’ Rights at the End of Life in Chilean Juridical System. Legal and Jurisprudential Analysis apid evolution of new healthcare quandaries and define a legal way to regulate healthcare practices at the end of life, as well as to delimit normative impact of them in our society, within so sensitive axiological contexts such as individual autonomy and the right to self-determine the vital project.