我赞成
发表于 2025-3-21 17:40:55
书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aspects of the Hague Rules读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0163122<br><br> <br><br>
虚情假意
发表于 2025-3-21 22:54:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04840-4eir national law is often considered to be that which they probably intended to be applied.. This reasoning is not appropriate to the applicability of the Convention, for the parties no longer have any say in the matter. Nonetheless the contact of common nationality has been favoured by the French courts.
虚构的东西
发表于 2025-3-22 00:42:41
Introduction From the Eyes of an Historian,s, or the law of the common nationality of the parties; as regards the latter, it is significant that there are few cases in which the only foreign element was the nationality of one of the parties and in which the Convention was applied. Only when one of these predominant indices is foreign, will the contract be ‘really international’.
树木中
发表于 2025-3-22 08:06:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5237-3 in order to compel the carrier to reply with proof of the condition of his vessel? What exactly must be comprised in the carrier’s reply? It follows that general consideration must be given to the entire scheme of proof under the Convention.
HAIRY
发表于 2025-3-22 09:52:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1632/163122/163122_5.png
Classify
发表于 2025-3-22 12:52:33
the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to Bills of Lading, signed at Brussels in 1924. The success of the Convention is wen recognised. Its importance is self-evident and such that, notwithstanding its success, it has been the subject of regular scrutiny with a view to improvement and reform. Att
NAVEN
发表于 2025-3-22 17:36:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1632/163122/163122_7.png
逗它小傻瓜
发表于 2025-3-22 23:32:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5237-3. The legal landscape of international bills of lading is apparently carved according to the Convention, but in neither country can its application be explained without reference to the previous law that lies beneath.
intellect
发表于 2025-3-23 03:33:49
Secrets of the Flight Data Recorderant. But when it is the “short route” and when art. IV r. I is treated as an ordinary exception, this proof must be given by the carrier. When art. III r. I is treated as a condition precedent this proof does not arise at all. Other questions concerning the method of proof and causation also arise.
invulnerable
发表于 2025-3-23 06:21:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1632/163122/163122_10.png