hallow 发表于 2025-3-25 03:53:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1620/161995/161995_21.pngDAMN 发表于 2025-3-25 09:38:12
4. Assessing Experience Utility,litics, namely the need to bring the realm of spirit to bear upon the realm of nature. The monarch’s body, I argue, is the plane where these two realities intersect, and has to be seen as a condition of possibility for their articulation.Calibrate 发表于 2025-3-25 15:34:42
Connecting to Skype at Home and Abroad,suous, I argue, instigates possibilities for a re-thinking of nature that puts finitude at its core. Hegel, I argue, needs to be re-read today not as the reigning philosopher of absolute idealism, who brings philosophy, and indeed politics, to a close, but instead as the thinker of finitude and the fragility of sense.Compass 发表于 2025-3-25 17:06:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1620/161995/161995_24.pngPalpitation 发表于 2025-3-25 22:47:08
Conclusion: Towards Finitude and the Fragility of Sensesuous, I argue, instigates possibilities for a re-thinking of nature that puts finitude at its core. Hegel, I argue, needs to be re-read today not as the reigning philosopher of absolute idealism, who brings philosophy, and indeed politics, to a close, but instead as the thinker of finitude and the fragility of sense.HOWL 发表于 2025-3-26 01:11:04
Book 2020 deal with them clearly and intelligently. Hardly any that do so jointly. This book is exceptional in offering a clear, scholarly and intelligent guide to their work. It focuses upon how Plato and Hegel deal with nature. While recognising the subtlety of Plato and Hegel on nature, Vicky Roupa estab宽度 发表于 2025-3-26 04:39:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1620/161995/161995_27.png单挑 发表于 2025-3-26 08:46:41
Articulations: Of Nature and Politics,ure and its link with politics by returning to two seminal philosophers, Plato and Hegel, for whom the natural and the political articulate at multiple junctures. The chapter outlines the main contribution each philosopher makes, explains the rationale, scope and interpretive strategy of the projectPatrimony 发表于 2025-3-26 12:41:28
Naming as , in Plato’s ure of their names. Socrates shows that this variety of naturalism fails because meaning cannot be a simple function of the affective qualities of the elements that make up words (just as the letter ‘l’ is supposed to convey smoothness). If a realist account of knowledge is to be retained, thereforeMultiple 发表于 2025-3-26 18:05:48
Producing the Categories of Being: Thefrom Cratylian naturalism and its metaphysical commitments, Parmenidean naturalism also stipulates a coincidence between being and language inasmuch as it calls upon the inquirer to desist, in the interests of truth, from trying to say or think that which is .. I discuss the portion of the dialogue