去是公开
发表于 2025-3-21 18:12:06
书目名称Argumentation in Science Education影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Science Education读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0161542<br><br> <br><br>
爱好
发表于 2025-3-21 21:57:21
A New Ideomotor Theory of Voluntary Controlamines and evaluates the numerous and at times iterative transformations of evidence into explanations (Duschl & Grandy, 2007). Thus, as this edited volume on argumentation demonstrates, educational researchers are focusing on ways to understanding the language of science and to support dialogic argumentation in science classrooms.
Initial
发表于 2025-3-22 01:09:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64537-7at is the unit of analysis of argument and of argumentation in classroom conversations? What criteria drive the selection and application of coding tools? What justifies the choice of one methodological approach over another? What does a particular methodological approach enable us to do and how does it do so?
Deceit
发表于 2025-3-22 06:11:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161542/161542_4.png
Rustproof
发表于 2025-3-22 10:29:11
Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classroomsat is the unit of analysis of argument and of argumentation in classroom conversations? What criteria drive the selection and application of coding tools? What justifies the choice of one methodological approach over another? What does a particular methodological approach enable us to do and how does it do so?
Prostaglandins
发表于 2025-3-22 13:16:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161542/161542_6.png
湿润
发表于 2025-3-22 19:51:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161542/161542_7.png
车床
发表于 2025-3-22 23:11:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161542/161542_8.png
小母马
发表于 2025-3-23 04:10:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161542/161542_9.png
Lucubrate
发表于 2025-3-23 05:52:51
Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteriaamines and evaluates the numerous and at times iterative transformations of evidence into explanations (Duschl & Grandy, 2007). Thus, as this edited volume on argumentation demonstrates, educational researchers are focusing on ways to understanding the language of science and to support dialogic argumentation in science classrooms.