Pessimistic 发表于 2025-3-21 20:05:33
书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0161533<br><br> <br><br>青春期 发表于 2025-3-21 21:29:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161533/161533_2.pngAnalogy 发表于 2025-3-22 00:39:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161533/161533_3.png祖传 发表于 2025-3-22 06:04:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161533/161533_4.png尊敬 发表于 2025-3-22 11:35:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161533/161533_5.png泥沼 发表于 2025-3-22 13:54:10
Argumentation for Decision Makingt the preferences of the decision maker. This agent is assumed to behave in a . way amgoud-woold, at least in the sense that his decisions should be as much as possible consistent with his preferences.ESPY 发表于 2025-3-22 18:12:38
ntation in Artificial Intelligence.A progressive developmentArgumentation is all around us. Letters to the Editor often make points of cons- tency, and “Why” is one of the most frequent questions in language, asking for r- sons behind behaviour. And argumentation is more than ‘reasoning’ in the rece柳树;枯黄 发表于 2025-3-22 22:05:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161533/161533_8.pngMagnitude 发表于 2025-3-23 02:11:59
Experimental Methods of Shock Wave Researcherred extensions establishes that its claim must be accepted as true, and membership of at least one preferred extension shows that the claim is at least tenable. In consequence, that admissible sets of arguments are conflict free is an important requirement under all the various semantics.Crayon 发表于 2025-3-23 06:15:19
Rengarajan Sriram,Gopalan Jagadeeshack another argument, but it can also support another one. This suggests a notion of bipolarity, .. the existence of two independent kinds of information which have a diametrically opposed nature and which represent repellent forces.