ANTE 发表于 2025-3-26 23:08:26
Argumentation from Reasonableness in the Justification of Judicial Decisionsvelop an argumentation model for the rational reconstruction that enables the analyst to make explicit the different considerations underlying a decision that is based on reasonableness so that they can be submitted to rational critique. To do justice to the context-dependency of the concept of reas有抱负者 发表于 2025-3-27 04:41:54
1572-4395 be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task. .978-3-319-35487-3978-3-319-16148-8Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315FECT 发表于 2025-3-27 05:20:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_33.pngnotice 发表于 2025-3-27 13:18:55
Ger van den Engh,Jan Visser,Barbara Traskvelop an argumentation model for the rational reconstruction that enables the analyst to make explicit the different considerations underlying a decision that is based on reasonableness so that they can be submitted to rational critique. To do justice to the context-dependency of the concept of reasTHROB 发表于 2025-3-27 15:52:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_35.png骂人有污点 发表于 2025-3-27 18:34:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_36.pngSIT 发表于 2025-3-28 00:30:13
An Analysis of Some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Lawthe conceptual dichotomy first/second interpretation, the systematizing tools employed by jurists in order to create, avoid, or ascertain systematic defects of the law, such as normative gaps and inconsistencies. The operations consisting in ordering legal materials in light of a set of underlying principles are finally examined.不能约 发表于 2025-3-28 02:24:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_38.png小故事 发表于 2025-3-28 06:33:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_39.pnggene-therapy 发表于 2025-3-28 12:50:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_40.png