过份艳丽 发表于 2025-3-23 13:41:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_11.png表示向前 发表于 2025-3-23 17:45:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_12.pngParameter 发表于 2025-3-23 21:20:35
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation978-3-319-16148-8Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315约会 发表于 2025-3-24 00:20:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_14.pngBOOM 发表于 2025-3-24 03:13:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_15.pngemission 发表于 2025-3-24 09:33:40
M. P. McGarry,A. M. Miller,D. G. Colleygal decision maker to assess, as the legal decision maker – who lacks expert knowledge on the subject issue – must distinguish between experts that are highly reliable and experts that are less reliable. A methodology for the assessment of the expert testimony has been suggested previously, in the wDevastate 发表于 2025-3-24 13:32:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_17.png裤子 发表于 2025-3-24 18:00:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161523/161523_18.pngpaleolithic 发表于 2025-3-24 22:52:17
Experimental Hematology Today 1978h the logical validity of this argument. Once established its logical validity, I shall try to argue that the second premise of the Sorites argument – the premise in accordance with if an individual . has the property . by having . unities of something, then another individual . which has .1 unitiesParaplegia 发表于 2025-3-25 00:02:12
Experimental Hematology Today 1978sts itself in . and . In analyzing strategic maneuvering one category of parameters to be considered are the constraints of the institutional context. In this paper I explore the institutional constraints for topical selection for the legal argumentative activity type .. I will make a distinction be