重婚 发表于 2025-3-21 18:23:01

书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Arguing Fundamental Rights读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0161516<br><br>        <br><br>

冷漠 发表于 2025-3-21 22:18:47

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4919-4Comparative Constitutional Law; Constitutional Adjudication; Discourse Theory; Fundamental Rights; Hart;

弄脏 发表于 2025-3-22 03:52:10

978-90-481-7227-6Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

歌曲 发表于 2025-3-22 07:00:59

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161516/161516_4.png

全国性 发表于 2025-3-22 10:54:43

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161516/161516_5.png

superfluous 发表于 2025-3-22 14:40:21

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161516/161516_6.png

crease 发表于 2025-3-22 19:27:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161516/161516_7.png

灿烂 发表于 2025-3-22 23:36:02

Some Elements of a Theory of European Fundamental Rights

小丑 发表于 2025-3-23 05:18:59

http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161516/161516_9.png

嘲笑 发表于 2025-3-23 07:36:15

1572-4395 fundamental rights to private parties, or whether certain fundamental rights should or should not be regarded as ultimate reasons for action, and as such, could be not be limited, not even when it conflict with978-90-481-7227-6978-1-4020-4919-4Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
页: [1] 2 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Arguing Fundamental Rights; Agustín José Menéndez,Erik Oddvar Eriksen Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Comparative Cons