大脑
发表于 2025-3-21 19:24:13
书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0160553<br><br> <br><br>
清真寺
发表于 2025-3-21 21:53:01
1879-8578 a presentation of the foundation of Aquinas‘s moralphilosophy? Professor Doig answers these questions through anexamination of the historical context within which the .Sententia.was composed. .In Chapters 1-2, the work‘s role as a corrective of earliercommentaries is established. Chapter 3, by exami
EVADE
发表于 2025-3-22 04:00:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49777-6 human happiness. However, if the . were intended, as is so often claimed, as a theological transformation of Aristotle’s philosophical text, would Aquinas have been so intent on exposing the correct meaning of the .?
厨师
发表于 2025-3-22 07:21:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1606/160553/160553_4.png
Immobilize
发表于 2025-3-22 10:47:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1606/160553/160553_5.png
insert
发表于 2025-3-22 13:04:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1606/160553/160553_6.png
BOAST
发表于 2025-3-22 20:37:16
Lisa Schiefele,Stefanie Bohn,Simon Sachsproposed a philosophical interpretation of the .. In the present Chapter, I propose to examine the grounds which appear to have provided the greatest support for concluding that the . is a theological work. In this regard, Jaffa’s comparative study of the . and the . provides a useful focus.
使习惯于
发表于 2025-3-23 00:50:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1606/160553/160553_8.png
思想
发表于 2025-3-23 03:42:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1606/160553/160553_9.png
faultfinder
发表于 2025-3-23 05:42:46
Dating the ,,roposed the . as having itself been written somewhat later than previously thought.. Consequently, Gauthier now dates the . after early 1271 and the . after the summer ofthat year, thus late 1271–1272. Yet Gauthier’s original dates of 1271–1272 for the ., as well as its posteriority relative to the ., continue to stand..