packet 发表于 2025-3-23 12:00:32
Objects of Nature and Objects of Thoughtthical schemas: ecological ethics, as defined and discussed by Donaldson and Kymlicka, capability ethics, described by Nussbaum, and Haraway’s companion species ethics. The novel’s unwillingness to engage in a discussion regarding wild animals in captivity, and grizzly bear welfare, is found to be especially problematic.Flu表流动 发表于 2025-3-23 14:27:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157719/157719_12.png令人作呕 发表于 2025-3-23 18:46:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157719/157719_13.png颠簸地移动 发表于 2025-3-23 23:15:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157719/157719_14.png河流 发表于 2025-3-24 02:49:12
Quantum Entanglements in Arthur Conan Doyle’s reciprocal shift it makes in the status of the hound itself. As the chapter nevertheless argues, the creature that emerges from these entanglements cannot in the last analysis be reduced to any single reading of it: it is its own haunting self, even in death.两栖动物 发表于 2025-3-24 08:33:11
The Psittacine Witness: Parrot Talk and Animal Ethics in Earl Derr Biggers’ , and Earl Stanley Gardnhe problematic logic of animals as commodities. Ultimately, global capital represents the overarching context in which ethical relationship with parrots unfold. I argue that this economic aspect provides a notable tension with and counterpoint to the ethical commitments the parrots invite.有角 发表于 2025-3-24 12:33:47
Ecology, Capability and Companion Species: Conflicting Ethics in Nevada Barr’s thical schemas: ecological ethics, as defined and discussed by Donaldson and Kymlicka, capability ethics, described by Nussbaum, and Haraway’s companion species ethics. The novel’s unwillingness to engage in a discussion regarding wild animals in captivity, and grizzly bear welfare, is found to be especially problematic.patriot 发表于 2025-3-24 15:34:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157719/157719_18.pngcondescend 发表于 2025-3-24 22:42:04
Animals, Biopolitics, and Sensation Fiction: M. E. Braddon’s ife as Giorgio Agamben understands it, including animals so as to exclude them, rendering animal life disposable in order to demarcate the human life that is valuable. However, a closer look reveals that Braddon’s attention to animals ultimately complicates this dynamic, opening up spaces that resist and refuse the abandonment of life.FLASK 发表于 2025-3-24 23:47:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157719/157719_20.png