军械库
发表于 2025-3-26 22:40:30
The Real and its Personae and Impersonaes of ordinary language must take account of statements about belief and it has been presupposed at many points that the solipsist could give an account of belief. However, many philosophers hold that it is not possible to analyze statements of this sort into statements about sensations, much less in
ADORN
发表于 2025-3-27 04:39:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156657/156657_32.png
PON
发表于 2025-3-27 09:00:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156657/156657_33.png
血友病
发表于 2025-3-27 12:05:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156657/156657_34.png
Ataxia
发表于 2025-3-27 17:40:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156657/156657_35.png
Gene408
发表于 2025-3-27 20:09:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156657/156657_36.png
雪上轻舟飞过
发表于 2025-3-28 00:45:07
A Quasi-Axiomatic Solipsistic Systemtheorems do not really follow from the axioms by methods of deduction. Further, the kind of method he had in mind was that of Euclid and we here want to use the modern axiomatic method. We will therefore begin with a brief discussion of changes in the axiomatic method which have taken place in modern times.
Heretical
发表于 2025-3-28 02:46:28
Conclusionis a legitimate heir to the title of solipsism. Further, this system is hopefully free of any contradiction or circularity of analysis. It is at least as economical as its competitors even though there are some assumptions which must be granted.
cauda-equina
发表于 2025-3-28 10:03:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156657/156657_39.png
马具
发表于 2025-3-28 12:31:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42974-4 anything we could imagine. The objection then is that if we could only talk about the things we can imagine, there would be many objects in the world about which we would not be able to talk meaningfully, but that we in fact do talk meaningfully about these objects.