Calibrate 发表于 2025-3-23 11:44:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1407-6Edmund Husserl; Martin Heidegger; concept; phenomenology伪善 发表于 2025-3-23 15:49:33
978-90-247-1880-1Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1976WITH 发表于 2025-3-23 20:28:55
American University Publications in Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/156544.jpgconjunctivitis 发表于 2025-3-23 22:55:44
EDQ Based Direct Time Integration Methods,I want to distinguish the question what Phenomenology is from certain special questions about certain special claims that are made for it.神圣不可 发表于 2025-3-24 05:25:25
Development of DQEM Irregular Elements,The kind of confrontation that I propose here is not intended to generate a hybrid offshoot. Each philosophy is an organism which has its internal rules of development. What we may best do is to understand each better by means of the other and, perhaps, formulate new problems that proceed from its encounter.bronchiole 发表于 2025-3-24 08:35:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31185-8Heidegger and Wittgenstein are naturally to a high degree philosophical contraries. The aim of this article is not to deny this. But in spite of the difference in intention and philosophical attitude there is a similar awareness (consciousness) in both. The purpose of the article is to show this.patriarch 发表于 2025-3-24 14:28:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1566/156544/156544_17.png符合规定 发表于 2025-3-24 15:09:08
Basic Description of Bucket Elevators,In this paper I have tried to find some points of comparison between the methods respectively of phenomenology and linguistic analysis. I have tried to show that they are more alike than they appear at first sight, and that in their extreme forms they are as it were “symmetrical” deviations from what may come to be an agreed norm.实现 发表于 2025-3-24 21:58:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1566/156544/156544_19.png高调 发表于 2025-3-24 23:43:48
Husserl and Wittgenstein on LanguageThe kind of confrontation that I propose here is not intended to generate a hybrid offshoot. Each philosophy is an organism which has its internal rules of development. What we may best do is to understand each better by means of the other and, perhaps, formulate new problems that proceed from its encounter.