intimate
发表于 2025-3-25 03:43:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16959-7philosophy; philosophy of religion; religion
ADJ
发表于 2025-3-25 09:19:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14178-5nd unequivocally endorse — endorse because we have not found it wanting after the toughest, most nonevasive scrutiny. This is obscure talk and the wary philosopher has a right to be suspicious. Philosophers, including philosophers of religion, it is often remarked, should be concerned with meaning.
假装是我
发表于 2025-3-25 12:22:05
Die endliche Fourier-Transformation,fs are unintelligible, incoherent, irrational or false the whole-way-of-life, centring around them, is ‘a house of cards’. Certain segments of it may still be seen to have a value when viewed from some other perspective, but if these primary religious beliefs are faulted, the religious . itself has
自负的人
发表于 2025-3-25 18:30:27
Die endliche Walsh-Transformation, the context of talking about the meaning of religious utterances is to show a rather complete lack of comprehension of their actual role in our lives. It, so the argument would run, is to treat them too much like hypotheses and to model God-talk too much on scientific discourse. A sensitive underst
anaphylaxis
发表于 2025-3-25 20:03:10
Sebastian Jentsch,Torsten Birthron, Coburn, Mounce and D. Z. Phillips.. Some of their contentions will serve as targets for my argumentation, for as much as I admire Wittgenstein, it seems to me that the fideistic conclusions drawn by these philosophers from his thought are often absurd. This leads me back to an inspection of the
Kaleidoscope
发表于 2025-3-26 02:02:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_26.png
Baffle
发表于 2025-3-26 05:56:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_27.png
泰然自若
发表于 2025-3-26 09:11:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_28.png
STAT
发表于 2025-3-26 16:16:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_29.png
subacute
发表于 2025-3-26 18:28:30
7楼