诱导
发表于 2025-3-23 13:11:05
Perplexities about Religion,tterances, but we also are concerned to discover something . religion that we can justifiably endorse. In fact, interest in the meaning of religious utterances is largely subservient to our interest in the truth or falsity of religion or religious beliefs.
ZEST
发表于 2025-3-23 16:49:45
The Challenge of Wittgenstein,, . philosopher, can in no way legitimately criticise this whole mode of discourse or claim that it is unintelligible or incoherent, though he can, and often should, criticise what theologians or philosophers say about it. What we in effect learn from Moore and directly learn from Wittgenstein is th
形上升才刺激
发表于 2025-3-23 19:07:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_13.png
左右连贯
发表于 2025-3-24 00:48:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_14.png
chastise
发表于 2025-3-24 04:32:07
Overview: 978-0-333-11466-7978-1-349-16959-7
harmony
发表于 2025-3-24 07:37:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_16.png
音乐会
发表于 2025-3-24 13:50:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_17.png
nephritis
发表于 2025-3-24 15:15:11
Wittgensteinian Fideism: I,ron, Coburn, Mounce and D. Z. Phillips.. Some of their contentions will serve as targets for my argumentation, for as much as I admire Wittgenstein, it seems to me that the fideistic conclusions drawn by these philosophers from his thought are often absurd. This leads me back to an inspection of their arguments and the premises in these arguments.
北极熊
发表于 2025-3-24 19:19:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155584/155584_19.png
GROWL
发表于 2025-3-24 23:44:00
http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/155584.jpg