CUR 发表于 2025-3-27 00:45:05
Ethicsules, norms, or codes employed in acting morally; and (normative) ethics, the principles of goodness that are reflected in morals. But it is also clear that Merleau-Ponty usually employs these terms in the senses specified, and those are, consequently, the ways that they will be used here.Cervical-Spine 发表于 2025-3-27 02:02:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1551/155006/155006_32.pngDiverticulitis 发表于 2025-3-27 08:25:56
Book 1987enology of the social world. In so doing, the essay addresses the rather narrow scholarly question, If Merleau-Ponty had written a phenomenology of law, what would it have looked like? But this scholarly enterprise, although impeccable in itself, is also transcended by a more complicated concern forALE 发表于 2025-3-27 11:48:19
Introduction very different sort of question. Namely, if Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological descriptions of the social world are correct—as I believe they largely are—then what are the philosophical consequences for an adequate understanding of law?nostrum 发表于 2025-3-27 17:16:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1551/155006/155006_35.pngentitle 发表于 2025-3-27 19:27:37
Law and Morality are usually situated in the contexts of politics, economics, and history. Although productive of less exciting discussions, perhaps, these contexts do at least have the compensatory advantage of generating more interesting and thorny philosophical problems.除草剂 发表于 2025-3-28 00:27:26
0079-1350 context of Maurice Merleau-Ponty‘s phe nomenology of the social world. In so doing, the essay addresses the rather narrow scholarly question, If Merleau-Ponty had written a phenomenology of law, what would it have looked like? But this scholarly enterprise, although impeccable in itself, is also tr防御 发表于 2025-3-28 05:11:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1551/155006/155006_38.png里程碑 发表于 2025-3-28 08:23:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1551/155006/155006_39.pngcarotenoids 发表于 2025-3-28 11:03:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6019-2stortions at the hands of earlier positivists, the American Legal Realists, and pure formalists of various stripes. And he has done so with such lucidity and persuasiveness that his work certainly constitutes a “decisive sedimentation” (S 194), back beyond which it will not be possible to go in the