Aesthete
发表于 2025-3-26 22:30:53
Rights and Duties,Normative relationships, whether moral or legal or both, thus break up into dual components in that two-party relations have to include a right on the one hand with a duty on the other. It would be pointless to say that a person . do something without there being other people related to that ‘may’;
Meander
发表于 2025-3-27 02:34:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30560-7nant, or the right to compete in trade, or the right to picket.. We shall call these defensive rights, sometimes called liberties or liberty-rights, to distinguish them from rights with correlative duties or fully assertive rights.
动机
发表于 2025-3-27 08:54:59
Mike Pedler,Tom Boydell,John Burgoynehole, but with the object of re-examining, as it happens very critically, his three central themes: (a) his distinction between claims and liberties, (b) his views of the ‘no-right’, as he called a liberty’s correlative, and (c) his views of powers and immunities.
幸福愉悦感
发表于 2025-3-27 09:44:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1549/154821/154821_34.png
用树皮
发表于 2025-3-27 15:23:57
,Tod eines Soldaten / Tod eines Märtyrers, limb refer to a person’s physical or mental integrity: he is to be free from compulsion or other avoidable interference, whereas the right to property extends this immunity to things, or assets, sometimes opportunities.
FACT
发表于 2025-3-27 18:40:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1549/154821/154821_36.png
有斑点
发表于 2025-3-27 23:06:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1549/154821/154821_37.png
DEAWL
发表于 2025-3-28 03:19:23
From Positive to Natural Rights,ight which is contained in a ‘literary’ source, be this an oral tradition or a written law, sources through which positive rights thus declare their existence, the sources being those which the institutional operators recognise as authoritative.
外面
发表于 2025-3-28 08:14:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1549/154821/154821_39.png
Preserve
发表于 2025-3-28 14:20:58
The Limits of Rights,ally handicapped who lack the intellectual capacity even to appreciate rights? Still it has long been accepted, both in law and morals, that a child has rights just as has the lunatic. What we have to discuss is why, theoretically, this should be so.