粗野的整个 发表于 2025-3-21 17:05:56

书目名称Althusser and Pasolini影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Althusser and Pasolini读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0154203<br><br>        <br><br>

Ligament 发表于 2025-3-21 23:24:55

Contextualization difficult question: where does one begin? Every beginning requires an assumption, and yet the idea of a beginning is that it does not include an assumption, that it is prior to any assumption. One has to ask, where does and how does one begin from? This question gets a further complicated twist whe

勤勉 发表于 2025-3-22 01:03:38

Periodization of him.” To flirt with Hegelian terminology, I would argue that the philosophy of Marxism reached its notion with Althusser in the philosophical and ideological conjuncture of his time. As elaborated in the Introduction (Chap. .), the conjunctures that defined his work were different and therefore

capsaicin 发表于 2025-3-22 07:42:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1543/154203/154203_4.png

任意 发表于 2025-3-22 12:26:45

Structural Causalitynt endeavor to overcome Hegelian dialectics. But, the question is: whether he really succeeded in doing so? Through the concept of structural causality, Althusser opposed the conventional conceptions of causality (linear and expressive). Some of Althusser’s commentators (such as Ted Breton) argued t

小丑 发表于 2025-3-22 13:59:30

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1543/154203/154203_6.png

Gudgeon 发表于 2025-3-22 18:28:55

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1543/154203/154203_7.png

详细目录 发表于 2025-3-22 23:13:52

Proletariat of Human Condition Versus the Proletariat of Laborry texts which attempted to read the predicament of the beginning of the Cold War. The fear of atomic bombs as a consequence of the Cold War was indeed real, but “proletarization” of the people (“we are all victims”) from all classes of the social whole. The Marxist side of Althusser comes to say th

menopause 发表于 2025-3-23 01:43:13

Christian Materialism one to another. The tradition of . has proven us that it is possible to suture Marxism and Christianity. However, the main question is: whether it is possible to be a materialist (or a Marxist) without going through the religious opus? Or even better: is it possible to be a materialist (and in this

江湖骗子 发表于 2025-3-23 08:02:50

Antiphilosophyill remain in the terrain of philosophy? “The truth” and “meaning” have always been antagonistic categories: in Badiou’s philosophy, the rupture between truth and sense marks the struggle between philosophy and antiphilosophy. In Badiou’s thought, the emergence of the antiphilosophical tradition (wh
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Althusser and Pasolini; Philosophy, Marxism, Agon Hamza Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Louis Althusser.Pier