fitful
发表于 2025-3-21 16:51:26
书目名称Against Equality影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Against Equality读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0150982<br><br> <br><br>
Forehead-Lift
发表于 2025-3-21 23:19:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150982/150982_2.png
affinity
发表于 2025-3-22 01:51:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150982/150982_3.png
CHAFE
发表于 2025-3-22 06:39:44
Against equality againately, or because the position I attacked was not one that any egalitarian really wished to maintain, or because I had overlooked other arguments which were effective in establishing egalitarian conclusions, or because the positive counter-arguments of my own I put forward more as a matter of taste
Substance
发表于 2025-3-22 09:17:35
Equality under the lawimited end’. It must not seek to ‘judge an individual person or an isolated fact’. It must not purport to determine specific rights arising out of a situation not previously regulated by general agreement. It ‘changes its nature when called upon to pronounce upon a particular object’.
ALOFT
发表于 2025-3-22 15:56:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150982/150982_6.png
血统
发表于 2025-3-22 19:16:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150982/150982_7.png
欲望小妹
发表于 2025-3-22 22:54:08
Equality of opportunity and equality of resultstunity, I must clarify at the outset certain points about inequalities in society. For it is the confusion between different meanings of inequality that leads Jencks and his colleagues to the fundamental difficulties of the book.
Repatriate
发表于 2025-3-23 03:00:49
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55425-3espect to equality. In the past, unifying ideas tended to be religious in substance. There are certainly signs that equality is taking on a sacred aspect among many minds today, that it is rapidly acquiring dogmatic status, at least among a great many philosophers and social scientists.
Ambulatory
发表于 2025-3-23 05:43:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150982/150982_10.png