保守
发表于 2025-3-28 17:33:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_41.png
让你明白
发表于 2025-3-28 21:24:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_42.png
CRAB
发表于 2025-3-28 23:53:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_43.png
挥舞
发表于 2025-3-29 05:44:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_44.png
Ligament
发表于 2025-3-29 09:51:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_45.png
无弹性
发表于 2025-3-29 13:08:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_46.png
ELATE
发表于 2025-3-29 17:14:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_47.png
arthrodesis
发表于 2025-3-29 22:41:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_48.png
impaction
发表于 2025-3-30 03:33:05
Global Egalitarianism or National Self-Determination? in particular. A debate has arisen between defenders of global justice and defenders of national self-determination, with the latter camp sometimes arguing that although some forms of global justice are valuable, the call for global equality, if realized, would seriously endanger any meaningful for
Interregnum
发表于 2025-3-30 04:02:21
Galileo and Modern Science (,),vidence. The argument, instead, is about changes in the current world order that necessitate, according to its supporters, some form of global democracy. The argument is functional in form: there are certain essential tasks that need to be fulfilled, and that can only be fulfilled by democratic institutions operating above the national level.